The equine sarcoid is the most commonly detected skin tumour in
equids worldwide and has been reported in horses, donkeys and mules
(Jackson, 1936
; Ragland et al., 1970
; Sundberg et
al., 1977
; Thomsett, 1979
; Pascoe &
Summers, 1981
; Marti et al., 1993
; Goldschmidt &
Hendrick, 2002
). Despite the similarity of terminology,
the equine sarcoid is unrelated to human sarcoidosis. Sarcoids can
be defined as locally aggressive fibroblastic benign tumours of
equine skin (Ragland et al., 1970
) and can occur as
single or multiple lesions in different forms, ranging from small
wart-like lesions to large ulcerated fibrous growths. Examples of
the clinical appearance of sarcoids are shown in Fig. 1 and the
histopathological features of a sarcoid are shown in Fig. 2. Lesions can occur all
over the body but show sites of predilection particularly in the
paragenital region, the thoraxabdomen and head and
frequently occur at sites of previous injury and scarring
(Torrontegui & Reid, 1994
). Sarcoids can sometimes be confused with
other skin lesions; for example, their rapid growth and
transference from one part of the horse to another is similar to
that observed with equine papillomas. However, spontaneous
regression, which is common in equine papillomas, is rarely seen in
sarcoids (Brostrom et al., 1979
). Currently, in
veterinary dermatopathology, there is an undercurrent to change the
term sarcoid to fibroma or fibrosarcoma; however, in this review,
the term sarcoid is used throughout.
Fig. 1. (a)
Fibroblastic sarcoids affecting the medial aspect of the hind legs
of a horse. (b) Verrucose sarcoid located on the external nares of
a horse.
Fig. 2. Histopathological features of a verrucose sarcoid. Hyperkeratosis,
rete pegging and fibroblastic whorls characteristic of the lesion
may be seen. Note that in fibroblastic lesions, ancanthosis is a
prominent feature and the lesion is more difficult to distinguish
from a dermal fibroma. Stain, H&E; magnification, x400.
Studies on the epidemiology of the equine sarcoid have been
hampered by a lack of population data and the low prevalence of
disease in animals usually kept as individuals or in small groups.
Ragland et al. (1966
), postulating on the virus aetiology of
the disease, described an outbreak of sarcoids in a small group of
horses and Reid et al. (1994
) estimated an incidence of 0.6 cases per
100 animal-years in a population of donkeys. Similarly, there have
been descriptions of the disease occurring within particular breeds
and bloodlines associated with equine leucocyte antigens (James,
1968
; Lazary et al., 1985
; Meredith et al., 1986
; Angelos et
al., 1988
; Brostrom et al., 1988
). Risk factors
remain equivocal, although MHC type, age and sex are emerging as
worthy of greater scrutiny. On balance, it would appear that young
males appear to be at more risk of disease (Mohammed et al.,
1992
; Reid
et al., 1994
; Torrontegui & Reid, 1994
; Reid &
Mohammed, 1997
). Reid & Mohammed (1997
) attempted to
address the apparent paragenital predilection site for the tumour
in young males, suggesting a possible association with castration.
They demonstrated that this surgical intervention was not
statistically significant for disease occurrence in a population of
donkeys when controlling for age. With regard to transmission, in
the absence of outbreak data and, apart from Ragland's report
(Ragland et al., 1966
), long-term studies in the same population
of donkeys provide some additional evidence of transmission between
animals in close contact, although pedigree was an unmeasured and
likely confounder in the study (Reid et al., 1994
). Without doubt,
the known MHC association and the lack of definitive experimental
transmission studies involving known papillomavirus types impede
our understanding of the epidemiology of the equine sarcoid.
| EVIDENCE FOR VIRUS AETIOLOGY |
Many lines of evidence suggest the involvement of an infectious
agent in the development of equine sarcoid tumours. The first
report describing the equine sarcoid suggested a virus origin for
the tumours based on their appearance and pattern of spread
(Jackson, 1936
). Subsequently, more substantial evidence
was provided by transmission studies in which inoculation with
either sarcoid tissue or cell-free supernatant from minced tumours
onto the scarified skin of sarcoid-free horses resulted in the
appearance of tumours at the inoculation site; these sarcoids were
morphologically indistinguishable from naturally occurring sarcoids
(Voss, 1969
). Similarly, inoculation with bovine
papillomavirus (BPV) in non-affected horses resulted in the growth
of sarcoid-like tumours (Olson & Cook, 1951
; Ragland &
Spencer, 1969
). However, the artificially induced
sarcoids showed spontaneous regression, which is rarely encountered
in naturally occurring sarcoid tumours. The results of these
transmission experiments remain difficult to assess conclusively,
as they do not take into account any hostagent
interactions and the genetic susceptibility of the host.
Although a virus has been suspected as a causative agent (Olson
& Cook, 1951
; Ragland & Spencer, 1969
), no papillomavirus
has been isolated from clinical cases. Studies on a cell line
derived from an equine sarcoid (the MC-1 cell line) and on a cell
line derived from a tumour induced by inoculation of a combined
immunodeficient foal with MC-1 cells (the T-77-4 cell line)
revealed the presence of virus particles containing high molecular
mass RNA genomes and reverse-transcriptase activity (England et
al., 1973
; Fatemi-Nainie et al., 1982
, 1984
; Cheevers et
al., 1982
). However, the virus associated with MC-1
cells and their derivatives was a non-oncogenic,
replication-defective virus, presumed to be an endogenous equine
retrovirus, and a causative relationship between this virus and
equine sarcoids was not established (Cheevers et al.,
1986
).
| BPV AS THE CAUSATIVE AGENT OF SARCOIDS |
There is a large body of evidence now supporting the hypothesis
that BPV is the aetiological agent of equine sarcoids. Since the
initial suggestion of such a relationship between BPV and equine
sarcoids by Olson & Cook (1951
), groups in the USA, Australia,
continental Europe and the UK have reported the presence of the
closely related viruses BPV types 1 and 2 in equine sarcoids. Early
studies detected BPV DNA in sarcoids from horses and donkeys using
DNA hybridization techniques (Lancaster et al., 1979
; Amtmann et
al., 1980
; Trenfield et al., 1985
; Angelos et
al., 1991
; Lory et al., 1993
; Reid et
al., 1994
). In more recent years, PCR-based
detection methods offering greater sensitivity have been used to
demonstrate the presence of BPV DNA in sarcoids. The reported
detection rate varies between study groups, from 73 (Bloch et
al., 1994
) to 8891 (Martens et al.,
2001a
, b
) and
96100 % (Carr et al., 2001a
, b
; Otten et
al., 1993
). This variation may be attributable to
differences in tumour collection methodology, as the lowest rates
of detection are seen in studies using tumours stored in
formaldehyde for long periods of time. Both BPV types 1 and 2 have
been detected in sarcoid tumours with the predominant types varying
between studies. BPV DNA has not been detected in samples obtained
from horses without sarcoids or in non-sarcoid equine tumours or
equine papillomas (Otten et al., 1993
; Nasir et
al., 1997
; Carr et al., 2001a
, b
). However, it has
been found in some cases of dermatitis and the significance of this
is as yet unknown (Angelos et al., 1991
; unpublished
observations). Despite the consistent finding of papillomavirus DNA
in the sarcoid lesions, papillomavirus particles have not been
demonstrated and the disease is, therefore, considered to be a
non-productive infection in which viral DNA exists episomally
(Amtmann et al., 1980
; Lancaster, 1981
).
BPV gene expression has been examined in equine sarcoids using
RT-PCR and Western blotting. Nasir & Reid (1999
) examined 20 equine
sarcoids containing BPV type 1 DNA and demonstrated BPV-specific RNA in
all samples. Carr et al. (2001b
) analysed 23
sarcoids by Western blot and demonstrated the presence of the BPV
E5 protein in all tumours (including one in which the amount of
viral DNA was too low for detection), whereas E5 was absent in all
of the non-sarcoid samples examined.
Sequence analysis of BPV DNA extracted from sarcoids has revealed
the presence of distinct equine sarcoid-specific variants (Otten
et al., 1993
; Reid et al., 1994
). Reid et
al. (1994
) found two minor differences in the
sequence of the BPV E5 open reading frame in donkey sarcoids
compared with the published bovine sequences. However, another
report suggests absolute identity between the BPV E5 sequences in
sarcoids and the published BPV sequences (Carr et al.,
2001a
).
| MECHANISM OF TRANSFORMATION BY BPV IN CATTLE |
The family Papillomaviridae is a large family of animal and
human viruses that normally infect epithelial cells causing
hyperproliferative lesions known as warts, papillomas or
condylomas. Typically, papillomavirus-induced lesions are benign,
self-limiting and spontaneously regress. However, some
papillomavirus types are linked to malignancy; in particular, human
papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 are causally associated with
cervical carcinoma (IARC, 1995
).
Some types of papillomavirus can also infect fibroblasts and induce
fibro-epithelial tumours, including BPV types 1 and 2, which cause
benign fibropapillomas in cattle. Both viruses have a genome of
7900 bp of double-stranded DNA, with at least nine potential
reading frames. Like other papillomaviruses, the genome can be
split into two principal regions. The early (E) region, encodes the
transforming proteins E5, E6 and E7, and the replication and
transcription regulatory proteins E1 and E2. The late (L) region
encodes the structural proteins of the virus L1 and L2. The early
and late regions are separated by a stretch of non-transcribed DNA,
called the long control region, which contains the transcriptional
promoters and enhancer, the origin of DNA replication and binding
sites for numerous cellular transcription factors. During acute
virus infection, replication of the virus genome is linked strictly
to the state of differentiation of the infected cell. In papilloma
formation, for example, the virus infects initially the basal
keratinocytes. The early region genes are then expressed in the
undifferentiated basal and suprabasal layers. Viral DNA is
replicated in the differentiating spinous and granular layers and
expression of the late structural proteins is limited to the
terminally differentiated cells of the squamous layer, where the
new virus particles are encapsidated and released into the
environment as the cells die. Initiation of malignant
transformation is linked to the deregulated expression of the early
virus genes, which results in an uncontrolled proliferation (and
loss of differentiation) of the infected cells (Campo, 1997a
).
E5 and E6 are the transforming proteins of BPV. The major BPV
transforming protein, E5, is a short hydrophobic membrane protein
localizing to the Golgi apparatus and other intracellular
membranes. It binds to and constitutively activates the
platelet-derived growth factor-
receptor (PDGF-R) in transformed
cells by forming a stable complex with the receptor causing its
dimerization and transphosphorylation. The stimulation of the
PDGF-R activates a receptor signalling cascade, resulting in an
intracellular growth stimulatory signal (DiMaio & Mattoon,
2001
). E5
also binds 16K ductin/subunit c, a component of gap junctions and
of the vacuolar ATPase. This interaction is deemed responsible for
the downregulation of gap junction intracellular communication with
the consequent isolation of the infected cell from its neighbours
(Faccini et al., 1996
). Interaction with 16K leads also to
alkalinization of the endosomes and the Golgi apparatus (Straight
et al., 1995
; Schapiro et al., 2000
), with consequent
intracellular retention of MHC class I molecules (Ashrafi et
al., 2002
; Marchetti et al., 2002
). The absence of
MHC class I from the cell surface would help the infected cells
evade host immunosurveillance. Furthermore, E5 activates numerous
kinases, including cyclin A-cdk2, MAP, JNK, PI3 and c-Src, thus
interfering with proper cell-cycle control and signal transduction
cascades (Venuti & Campo, 2002
).
The E6 protein is found localized in membrane and nuclear fractions
and contains two highly conserved zinc finger domains typical of
DNA-binding transcription activator proteins. However, cell
transformation by E6 appears to be independent of its transcription
transactivation function (Ned et al., 1997
). While HPV E6
binds and stimulates degradation of p53, BPV E6 does not (Scheffner
et al., 1990
; Rapp et al., 1999
). Instead, the
transformational ability of BPV E6 is linked to its ability to bind
ERC-55/E6BP (Chen et al., 1995
) and, in part, CBP/p300 (Zimmermann et
al., 2000
). ERC-55/E6BP is a calcium-binding protein
and CBP/p300 is a transcriptional co-activator and binding of these
proteins by E6 would interfere with normal cell functions. E6 also
binds the focal adhesion protein paxillin (Tong & Howley,
1997
; Tong
et al., 1997
; Vande Pol et al., 1998
) and the
subunit
of the clathrin adaptor complex AP-1 (Tong et al., 1998
). These
interactions lead to disruption of cytoskeleton and vesicular
traffic pathways, respectively. The cytoskeleton is vital for the
maintenance of cellular morphology, motility, division and
cellcell and cellmatrix interactions and the
AP-1 complex plays an important role in the control of cell
proliferation and differentiation.
| BPV AND THE PATHOGENESIS OF EQUINE SARCOIDS |
Although thought initially to be species-specific, it is now known
that some papillomaviruses can infect species other than that with
which they are commonly associated and this can result in a
different pathological outcome to that in the normal host. For
example, cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) causes papillomas
in the natural host (cottontail rabbit) which only rarely progress
to carcinomas (Shope, 1933
), whereas it induces skin cancer at a
much higher frequency in domestic rabbits (Syverton, 1952
).
Similarly, BPV can induce fibroblastic tumours in C3H/eB mice
(Boiron et al., 1964
) and malignant fibroblastic tumours in
hamsters. These tumours are capable of metastasis from the subcutis
to the lungs, tail and extremities of the legs (Robl & Olson,
1968
).
Although malignant progression of HPV lesions often results in
integration of the viral DNA into the host genome, with loss of
regulated expression of the transforming viral genes, BPV genomes
are maintained episomally during transformation of cells of a
non-host species. In addition, only the early genes are transcribed
in order to maintain viral copy number and to control cell growth.
Thus, virus capsids are not formed, possibly because expression of
capsid proteins requires the cellular environment only found within
the well-differentiated keratinocytes of the host species (Sousa
et al., 1990
). In the case of equine sarcoids, although
BPV DNA has been detected widely and mRNA expression for L1 has
been shown (Nasir & Reid, 1999
), there is little evidence for expression
of the BPV structural proteins or for virus capsid formation (Reid,
1992
). This is supported by the observation that experimental
inoculation of sarcoid extracts in cattle does not induce warts
(Ragland & Spencer, 1969
). Therefore, BPV infection of equine
fibroblasts appears to be non-productive.
Recently, it has emerged that intra-type sequence variation occurs
within papillomavirus types, which can influence the cellular
location and function of the oncoproteins and consequently affect
the pathogenesis and transforming ability of the virus (Giannoudis
& Herrington, 2001
). Using sequence analysis of BPV DNA
isolates extracted from sarcoids, the presence of distinct equine
sarcoid-specific variants of BPV has been detected (Otten et
al., 1993
; Reid et al., 1994
). The sequence
changes in the E5 protein reported by Reid et al. (1994
) suggest the
possibility that these changes are contributory factors to the
pathogenesis of the disease. As found for HPV, these sequence
changes could affect the expression and function of the early virus
proteins and may explain the different pathogenesis of the equine
sarcoid compared to papillomas induced by BPV in cattle. However,
this remains to be established.
| OTHER FACTORS INVOLVED IN SARCOID DEVELOPMENT |
In addition to BPV infection, there is also evidence that the
development of sarcoids may be associated with a genetic
predisposition. A major long-term study into the association of
sarcoid development with breed carried out in the USA showed that
the frequency of sarcoids in quarter horses was nearly twice that
of thoroughbreds. In contrast, the frequency of sarcoids in
standardbred horses was less than half that of thoroughbreds
(Angelos et al., 1988
).
Other research has shown a strong association between risk of
sarcoid development and certain alleles of the class II region of
the equine MHC. When the frequency of equine MHC class II
haplotypes was examined in thoroughbred and standardbred horses in
the USA, it was found that there was a highly significant
association between the MHC class II haplotypes W3 and B1 in the
thoroughbred population. These findings were the first to suggest
an association between predisposition to sarcoids and particular
MHC haplotypes (Meredith et al., 1986
) and were later
confirmed by subsequent studies. It was found that the W13
haplotype is associated strongly with sarcoids in Swedish halfbreds
(Brostrom et al., 1988
) and Swiss Warmbloods (Gerber et
al., 1988
). A further Swedish study showed that
there is an association between increased recurrence of sarcoids
following surgery with the W13 haplotype and association between
early onset of sarcoids and the A5 haplotype (Brostrom, 1995
).
The underlying mechanisms associated with this genetic
predisposition are unclear. Specific MHC class II alleles may be
associated with an impaired immune response to BPV and/or other
tumour-associated sarcoid antigens, as defined in the MC-1 sarcoid
cell line (Watson & Larson, 1974
; Brostrom, 1989
). Certainly, there
is an association between certain MHC class II genes and the
development of tumours induced in rabbits by CRPV (Han et
al., 1992
) and in human cervical carcinoma
associated with HPV types 16 or 18 (Wank & Thomssen, 1991
; Breitburd et
al., 1996
).
The role of the immune response in determining the outcome of
papillomavirus infections is well known. In most cases, regression
of papillomavirus lesions occurs following activation of the host
immune response. However, several immune evasion mechanisms that
may contribute to persistence and malignant progression of
papillomavirus-associated disease have been described
(O'Brien & Campo, 2002
). Sarcoids are non-regressing, unlike many
other lesions caused by papillomavirus infection. This suggests
that expression of the BPV proteins in equine cells may evoke
similar immune evasion mechanisms. In particular, the expression of
BPV E5, which downregulates MHC class I expression (Ashrafi et
al., 2002
; Marchetti et al., 2002
) and hence may
affect the ability of the infected cells to be detected by
cytotoxic T lymphocytes, may be a major factor in BPV persistence.
In addition, sarcoids, although benign, are recurrent lesions,
reminiscent of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis in humans
caused by HPV types 6 or 11. The persistence of papillomaviruses in
these laryngeal lesions and recurrence of disease has been
attributed to a downregulation of the transporter associated with
antigen presentation (TAP) genes, causing a subsequent loss of the
MHC class I expression (Vambutas et al., 2001
). Very little is
known about the immune response to equine sarcoids and hence the
significance of these evasion mechanisms to prolonged BPV
persistence is not known.
Several investigators have examined the role of the tumour
suppressor gene p53 in equine sarcoids. Bucher et al.
(1996
) failed
to detect p53 gene mutations in equine sarcoid tumours, suggesting
that p53 does not play a significant role in the pathogenesis of
sarcoids. This was corroborated further by an investigation of
sarcoids in donkeys (Nasir et al., 1999
). However, more
recently, aberrant perinuclear localization of p53 has been
demonstrated in 44 % of equine sarcoid lesions (Martens et
al., 2001b
), suggesting that mutational independent
inactivation of p53 occurs commonly in sarcoids; the significance
of these finding remains to be elucidated.
| POSSIBLE MEANS OF TRANSMISSION OF INFECTION |
Although there is strong evidence that BPV types 1 and 2 are the
principal causative agent of sarcoids, there is currently no clear
evidence of a mode of transmission. As has been mentioned earlier,
there may be a predilection for sarcoid development at wound sites
and it has been proposed this may be due to flies acting as a
vector as they move between wound sites on different horses. One
study has reported the detection of BPV viral DNA sequences in face
flies, which are commonly seen around wounds and which tend to
frequent the head and neck area, one of the most common areas in
which sarcoids occur (Kemp-Symonds, 2000
). Furthermore, the same
viral DNA sequences were detected in the horses from which the
flies were removed. Alternatively, BPV infection may be transmitted
via stable management practices, such as the sharing of
contaminated tack, or passed into existing wounds from contaminated
pasture. Considerably more research is necessary to investigate all
of these possibilities.
Currently, there is no effective therapy for the treatment of
sarcoids. Some clinicians have reported pragmatic success with
topical unlicensed applications (Knottenbelt & Walker,
1994
). Other
commonly employed treatments include cryotherapy, excision and
local immune modulation (Goodrich et al., 1998
).
Efficacy of different treatments is difficult to assess because
most studies have not been controlled and are based on referral
populations of horses treated at major clinics or veterinary
hospitals. Such referral populations may not represent the overall
tumour population in the field but a subset of fast growing,
recurrent or multiple tumours that veterinary practitioners in the
field have been unable to treat successfully. Conversely, many
private practitioners treat sarcoids successfully by a policy of
non-intervention, which again may represent a specific population
of sarcoids that remain quiescent or the rare spontaneous
regressors and there is some anecdotal evidence for this (Goodrich
et al., 1998
).
Sarcoids frequently display hyperproliferation or recurrence if
treated by surgical excision, which has led some to speculate that
this could be due to activation of latent BPV in apparently normal
tissue surrounding the lesion. Martens et al. (2001a
) used PCR to test
for BPV in sarcoids removed by surgery and also tested apparently
normal skin around the sarcoids. They found BPV in all of the
sarcoids and also in the surrounding normal skin. The frequency of
detection of BPV in the normal skin decreased as the resection
margin was increased. They also found that animals with a surgical
margin containing BPV had a greater probability to show local
recurrence. These observations agree with the results of a study
that examined the inducement of tumour development by trauma in an
experimental model. Siegsmund et al. (1991
) used a laboratory
strain of the rodent Mastomys natalensis, which carries an
endogenous latent papillomavirus (MnPV), to show that when the skin
of these animals was irritated by scratching with glasspaper,
hyperproliferation of the epidermis and amplification of viral DNA
occurred, with virus-producing papillomas induced in 27 % of the
animals.
| IMPLICATIONS OF BPV INFECTION IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY |
The application of BPV testing in the diagnosis of sarcoids was
examined recently, resulting in a detection rate of 8891
% (Martens et al., 2001a
, b
). However, the presence of a large amount
of connective tissue in some types of sarcoid may affect the
ability of PCR amplification to detect viral DNA (Carr et
al., 2001b
). In addition, detection of viral protein
expression in samples apparently negative for viral DNA suggests
that the sensitivity of current PCR-based tests for BPV DNA in
sarcoid lesions is less than optimal. Taken together, this suggests
that PCR detection of BPV DNA would result in a proportion of false
negatives. Hence, the application of BPV DNA as a diagnostic test
for sarcoids would need to be carefully evaluated and validated.
However, the association of a causative virus agent does raise the
possibility of employing antiviral therapies in the treatment of
sarcoids, including vaccination against BPV in populations with a
high incidence of sarcoids, where, for example, a large number of
animals are stabled together for long periods of time. We have
shown previously in cattle that prophylactic vaccination against
the virus capsid proteins of BPV can prevent infection and disease
and therapeutic vaccination against the E7 protein can stimulate
regression of established papillomas (Campo et al.,
1993
; Jarrett
et al., 1991
), hence supporting the feasibility of
vaccination against BPV to reduce or eliminate disease (reviewed by
Campo, 1997b
). It has been suggested recently that the
E5 protein would be suitable as a target antigen for therapeutic
vaccination, both as a membrane-associated and, therefore,
immune-accessible protein, and because of its probable importance
in the pathogenesis of sarcoids (Carr et al., 2001a
). However,
considerable research would be needed in order to determine the
validity of such an approach.
While studies carried out over 40 years ago suggested that an
infectious agent was responsible for sarcoids, it has taken the
development of modern molecular biology methods to detect BPV DNA
in sarcoids and to demonstrate the expression of BPV-transforming
genes. It is now accepted almost universally that BPV is indeed the
aetiological agent of the equine sarcoid, which should lead to
improvements in diagnosis and treatment. In a more general sense,
defining the relationship between BPV and the equine sarcoid
further may shed new light on the role of papillomaviruses in the
progression and development of neoplastic disease and offer
considerable avenues for future research.
The research described here is supported by the Horserace Betting
Levy Board and the Home of Rest for Horses. M.S.C. is a Fellow of
Cancer Research UK.
Amtmann, E., Muller, H. & Sauer, G.
(1980). Equine connective tissue tumors contain unintegrated
bovine papilloma virus DNA. J Virol 35,
962964.
Angelos, J. A., Oppenheim, Y., Rebhun, W.,
Mohammed, H. & Antczak, D. F. (1988). Evaluation of breed
as a risk factor for sarcoid and uveitis in horses. Anim
Genet 19, 417425.
Angelos, J. A., Marti, E., Lazary, S.
& Carmichael, L. E. (1991). Characterization of BPV-like
DNA in equine sarcoids. Arch Virol 119,
95109.
Ashrafi, G. H., Tsirimonaki, E.,
Marchetti, B., O'Brien, P. M., Sibbet, G. J., Andrew, L.
& Campo, M. S. (2002). Down-regulation of MHC class I by
bovine papillomavirus E5 oncoproteins. Oncogene 21,
248259.
Bloch, N., Breen, M. & Spradbrow, P.
B. (1994). Genomic sequences of bovine papillomaviruses in
formalin-fixed sarcoids from Australian horses revealed by
polymerase chain reaction. Vet Microbiol 41,
163172.
Boiron, M., Levy, J. P., Thomas, M.,
Freidman, J. C. & Bernard, J. C. (1964). Some properties
of bovine papillomavirus. Nature 201,
423.
Breitburd, F., Ramoz, N., Salmon, J. &
Orth, G. (1996). HLA control in the progression of human
papillomavirus infections. Semin Cancer Biol 7,
359371.
Brostrom, H. (1989). Surface antigens
on equine sarcoid cells and normal dermal fibroblasts as assessed
by xenogenic antisera. Res Vet Sci 46,
172179.
Brostrom, H. (1995). Equine sarcoids.
A clinical and epidemiological study in relation to equine
leucocyte antigens (ELA). Acta Vet Scand 36,
223236.
Brostrom, H., Bredberg-Raden, U.,
England, J., Obel, N. & Perlmann, P. (1979). Cell-mediated
immunity in horses with sarcoid tumours against sarcoid cells in
vitro. Am J Vet Res 40,
17011706.
Brostrom, H., Fahlbrink, E., Dubath,
M.-L. & Lazary, S. (1988). Association between equine
leucocyte antigens (ELA) and equine sarcoid tumours in the
population of Swedish halfbreds and some of their families.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol 19,
215223.
Bucher, K., Szalai, G., Marti, E.,
Griot-Wenk, M. E., Lazary, S. & Pauli, U. (1996). Tumour
suppressor gene p53 in the horse: identification, cloning,
sequencing and a possible role in the pathogenesis of equine
sarcoid. Res Vet Sci 61,
114119.
Campo, M. S. (1997a). Bovine
papillomavirus and cancer. Vet J 154,
175188.
Campo, M. S. (1997b). Vaccination
against papillomavirus in cattle. Clin Dermatol 15,
275283.
Campo, M. S., Grindlay, G. J.,
O'Neil, B. W., Chandrachud, L. M., McGarvie, G. M. &
Jarrett, W. F. H. (1993). Prophylactic and therapeutic
vaccination against a mucosal papillomavirus. J Gen Virol
74, 945953.
Carr, E. A., Theon, A. P., Madewell, B.
R., Hitchcock, M. E., Schlegel, R. & Schiller, J. T.
(2001a). Expression of a transforming gene (E5) of bovine
papillomavirus in sarcoids obtained from horses. Am J
Vet Res 62, 12121217.
Carr, E. A., Theon, A. P., Madewell, B.
R., Griffey, S. M. & Hitchcock, M. E. (2001b). Bovine
papillomavirus DNA in neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissues obtained
from horses with and without sarcoids in the western United
States. Am J Vet Res 62,
741744.
Cheevers, W. P., Roberson, S. M.,
Brassfield, A. L., Davis, W. C. & Crawford, T. B. (1982).
Isolation of a retrovirus from cultured equine sarcoid tumour
cells. Am J Vet Res 43,
804806.
Cheevers, W. P., Fatemi-Nainie, S. &
Anderson, L. W. (1986). Spontaneous expression of an
endogenous retrovirus by the equine sarcoid-derived MC-1 cell
line. Am J Vet Res 47,
5052.
Chen, J. J., Reid, C. E., Band, V. &
Androphy, E. J. (1995). Interaction of papillomavirus E6
oncoproteins with a putative calcium-binding protein.
Science 269, 529531.
DiMaio, D. & Mattoon, D. (2001).
Mechanisms of cell transformation by papillomavirus E5 proteins.
Oncogene 20, 78667873.
England, J. J., Watson, R. E., Jr &
Larson, K. A. (1973). Virus-like particles in an equine
sarcoid cell line. Am J Vet Res 34,
16011603.
Faccini, A. M., Cairney, M., Ashrafi, G.
H., Finbow, M. E., Campo, M. S. & Pitts, J. D. (1996). The
bovine papillomavirus type 4 E8 protein binds to ductin and causes
loss of gap junctional intercellular communication in primary
fibroblasts. J Virol 70,
90419045.
Fatemi-Nainie, S., Anderson, L. W. &
Cheevers, W. P. (1982). Identification of a transforming
retrovirus from cultured equine dermal fibrosarcoma.
Virology 120, 490494.
Fatemi-Nainie, S., Anderson, L. W. &
Cheevers, W. P. (1984). Culture characteristics and
tumorigenicity of the equine sarcoid-derived MC-1 cell line.
Am J Vet Res 45, 11051108.
Gerber, H., Dubath, M.-L. & Lazary,
L. (1988). Association between predisposition to equine
sarcoid and MHC in multiple-case families. In Equine Infectious
Diseases, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, pp
272277. Edited by D. G. Powel. Kentucky: University
Press.
Giannoudis, A. & Herrington, C. S.
(2001). Human papillomavirus variants and squamous neoplasia
of the cervix. J Pathol 193,
295302.
Goldschmidt, M. H. & Hendrick, M. J.
(2002). Equine sarcoid. In Tumours in Domestic
Animals, 4th edition, pp 8889. Edited by D. J.
Meuten. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Goodrich, L., Gerber, H., Marti, E. &
Antczack, D. F. (1998). Equine sarcoids. Vet Clin N Am
Equine Prac 14, 607623.
Han, R., Breitburd, F., Marche, P. N.
& Orth, G. (1992). Linkage of regression and malignant
conversion of rabbit viral papillomas to MHC class II genes.
Nature 356, 6668.
IARC (1995). Monographson the
evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. In Human
Papillomaviruses. World Health Organization International
Agency for Research on Cancer.
Jackson, C. (1936). The incidence
and pathology of tumours of domesticated animals in South Africa.
Onderstepoort J Vet Sci Anim Ind 6,
378385.
James, V. S. (1968). A family
tendency to equine sarcoid. SW Vet 21,
235236.
Jarrett, W. F. H., Smith, K. T.,
O'Neil, B. W., Gaukrodger, J. M., Chandrachud, L. M.,
Grindlay, G. J., McGarvie, G. M. & Campo, M. S. (1991).
Studies on vaccination against papillomaviruses: prophylactic and
therapeutic vaccination with recombinant structural proteins.
Virology 184, 3342.
Kemp-Symonds, J. G. (2000). The
detection and sequencing of bovine papillomavirus type 1 and 2 DNA
from Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae) face flies
infesting sarcoid-affected horses. MSc thesis, Royal Veterinary
College, London, UK.
Knottenbelt, D. C. & Walker, J. A.
(1994). Treatment of the equine sarcoid. Equine Vet
Educ 6, 7275.
Lancaster, W. D. (1981). Apparent
lack of integration of bovine papillomavirus DNA in virus-induced
equine and bovine tumor cells and virus-transformed mouse cells.
Virology 108, 251255.
Lancaster, W. D., Theilen, G. H. &
Olson, C. (1979). Hybridization of bovine papilloma virus type
1 and type 2 DNA to DNA from virus-induced hamster tumors and
naturally occurring equine tumors. Intervirology
11, 227233.
Lazary, S., Gerber, H., Glatt, P. A.
& Straub, R. (1985). Equine leucocyte antigens in
sarcoid-affected horses. Equine Vet J 17,
283286.
Lory, S., von Tscharner, C., Marti, E.,
Bestetti, G., Grimm, S. & Waldvogel, A. (1993). In
situ hybridisation of equine sarcoids with bovine papilloma
virus. Vet Rec 132, 132133.
Marchetti, B., Ashrafi, G. H.,
Tsirimonaki, E., O'Brien, P. M. & Campo, M. S.
(2002). The papillomavirus oncoprotein E5 retains the major
histocompatibility class I in the Golgi apparatus and prevents its
transport to the cell surface. Oncogene 21 78087816.
Martens, A., De Moor, A., Demeulemeester,
J. & Peelman, L. (2001a). Polymerase chain reaction
analysis of the surgical margins of equine sarcoids for bovine
papilloma virus DNA. Vet Surg 30,
460467.
Martens, A., De Moor, A. & Ducatelle,
R. (2001b). PCR detection of bovine papilloma virus DNA in
superficial swabs and scrapings from equine sarcoids. Vet
J 161, 280286.
Marti, E., Lazary, S., Antczak, D. F.
& Gerber, H. (1993). Report of the first international
workshop on equine sarcoid. Equine Vet J 25,
397407.
Meredith, D., Elser, A. H., Wolf, B.,
Soma, L. R., Donawick, W. J. & Lazary, S. (1986). Equine
leukocyte antigens: relationships with sarcoid tumors and laminitis
in two pure breeds. Immunogenetics 23,
221225.
Mohammed, H. O., Rebhun, W. C. &
Antczack, D. F. (1992). Factors associated with the risk of
developing sarcoid tumours in horses. Equine Vet J
24, 165168.
Nasir, L. & Reid, S. W. J.
(1999). Bovine papillomaviral gene expression in equine
sarcoid tumours. Virus Res 61,
171175.
Nasir, L., McFarlane, S. T., Torrontegui,
B. O. & Reid, S. W. J. (1997). Screening for bovine
papillomavirus in peripheral blood cells of donkeys with and
without sarcoids. Res Vet Sci 63,
289290.
Nasir, L., McFarlane, S. T. & Reid,
S. W. J (1999). Mutational status of the tumour
suppressor gene (p53) in donkey sarcoid tumours. Vet J
157, 99101.
Ned, R., Allen, S. & Vande Pol, S.
(1997). Transformation by bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6 is
independent of transcriptional activation by E6. J Virol
71, 48664870.
O'Brien, P. M. & Campo, M. S.
(2002). Evasion of host immunity directed by
papillomavirus-encoded proteins. Virus Res 88, 103117.
Olson, C., Jr & Cook, R. H.
(1951). Cutaneous sarcoma-like lesions of the horse caused by
the agent of bovine papilloma. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
77, 281284.
Otten, N., Von Tscharner, C., Lazary, S.,
Antczak, D. F. & Gerber, H. (1993). DNA of bovine
papillomavirus type 1 and 2 in equine sarcoids: PCR detection and
direct sequencing. Arch Virol 132,
121131.
Pascoe, R. R. & Summers, P. M.
(1981). Clinical survey of tumours and tumour-like lesions in
horses in south east Queensland. Equine Vet J 13,
235239.
Ragland, W. L. & Spencer, G. R.
(1969). Attempts to relate bovine papilloma virus to the cause
of equine sarcoid: equidae inoculated intradermally with bovine
papilloma virus. Am J Vet Res 30,
743752.
Ragland, W. L., Keown, G. H. &
Gorham, J. R (1966). An epizootic of equine sarcoid.
Nature 210, 1399.
Ragland, W. H., Keown, G. H. &
Spencer, G. R. (1970). Equine sarcoid. Equine Vet J
2, 211.
Rapp, L., Liu, Y., Hong, Y., Androphy, E.
J. & Chen, J. J. (1999). The bovine papillomavirus type 1
E6 oncoprotein sensitizes cells to tumor necrosis factor
-induced
apoptosis. Oncogene 18, 607615.
Reid, S. W. J. (1992). The
equine sarcoid: molecular and epidemiological studies in Equus
asinus. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Reid, S. W. J. & Mohammed, H. O.
(1997). Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies to evaluate
the risk of sarcoid associated with castration. Can J
Vet Res 61, 8993.
Reid, S. W. J., Smith, K. T. &
Jarrett, W. H. F. (1994). Detection, cloning and
characterisation of papillomaviral DNA present in sarcoid tumours
of Equus asinus. Vet Rec 135,
430432.
Robl, M. G. & Olson, C. (1968).
Oncogenic action of bovine papilloma virus in hamsters. Cancer
Res 28, 15961604.
Schapiro, F., Sparkowski, J., Adduci, A.,
Suprynowicz, F., Schlegel, R. & Grinstein, S. (2000).
Golgi alkalinization by the papillomavirus E5 oncoprotein. J
Cell Biol 148, 305315.
Scheffner, M., Werness, B. A.,.
Huibregtse, J. M., Levine, A. J. & Howley, P. M.
(1990). The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus
types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell
63, 11291136.
Shope, R. E. (1933). Infectious
papillomatosis of rabbits; with a note on the histopathology.
J Exp Med 58, 607624.
Siegsmund, M., Wayss, K. & Amtmann,
E. (1991). Activation of latent papillomavirus genomes by
chronic mechanical irritation. J Gen Virol 72,
27872789.
Sousa, R., Dostatni, N. & Yaniv, M.
(1990). Control of papillomavirus gene expression.
Biochim Biophys Acta 1032, 1937.
Straight, S. W., Herman, B. &
McCance, D. J. (1995). The E5 oncoprotein of human
papillomavirus type 16 inhibits the acidification of endosomes in
human keratinocytes. J Virol 69,
31853192.
Sundberg, J. P., Burnstein, T., Page, E.
H., Kirkham, W. W. & Robinson, F. R. (1977). Neoplasms of
Equidae. J Am Vet Med Assoc 170,
150152.
Syverton, T. J. (1952). The
pathogenesis of the rabbit papilloma-to-carcinoma sequence.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 54, 11261140.
Thomsett, L. R. (1979). Skin
diseases of the horse. In Pract 1,
1526.
Tong, X. & Howley, P. M. (1997).
The bovine papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein interacts with paxillin
and disrupts the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A 94, 44124417.
Tong, X., Salgia, R., Li, J. L., Griffin,
J. D. & Howley, P. M. (1997). The bovine papillomavirus E6
protein binds to the LD motif repeats of paxillin and blocks its
interaction with vinculin and the focal adhesion kinase. J
Biol Chem 272, 3337333376.
Tong, X., Boll, W., Kirchhausen, T. &
Howley, P. M. (1998). Interaction of the bovine papillomavirus
E6 protein with the clathrin adaptor complex AP-1. J Virol
72, 476482.
Torrontegui, B. O. & Reid, S. J.
(1994). Clinical and pathological epidemiology of the equine
sarcoid in a referral population. Equine Vet Educ
6, 8588.
Trenfield, K., Spradbrow, P. B. &
Vanselow, B. (1985). Sequences of papillomavirus DNA in equine
sarcoids. Equine Vet J 17,
449452.
Vambutas, A., DeVoti, J., Pinn, W.,
Steinberg, B. M. & Bonagura, V. R. (2001). Interaction of
human papillomavirus type 11 E7 protein with TAP-1 results in the
reduction of ATP-dependent peptide transport. Clin Immunol
101, 9499.
Vande Pol, S. B., Brown, M. C. &
Turner, C. E. (1998). Association of bovine papillomavirus
type 1 E6 oncoprotein with the focal adhesion protein paxillin
through a conserved protein interaction motif. Oncogene
16, 4352.
Venuti, A. & Campo, M. S.
(2002). The E5 protein of Papillomaviruses. In Progress
in Medical Virology: Papillomaviruses, pp. 141162.
Edited by D. J. McCance. Iowa: Iowa State Press.
Voss, J. L. (1969).
Transmission of equine sarcoid. Am J Vet Res
30, 183191.
Wank, R. & Thomssen, C. (1991).
High risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix for women with
HLA-DQw3. Nature 352, 723725.
Watson, R. E., Jr & Larson, K. A
. (1974). Detection of tumor-specific antigens in an equine
sarcoid cell line. Infect Immun 9,
714718.
Zimmermann, H., Koh, C. H., Degenkolbe,
R., O'Connor, M. J., Muller, A., Steger, G., Chen, J. J.,
Lui, Y., Androphy, E. & Bernard, H. U. (2000). Interaction
with CBP/p300 enables the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6
oncoprotein to downregulate CBP/p300-mediated transactivation by
p53. J Gen Virol 81, 26172623.
JGV Direct table of contents
© 2003 SGM
This article is now available in the May
2003 print issue of JGV (vol. 84, 10551062).
The complete issue of the journal may be seen in electronic form on JGV Online.