![]() | REVIEW ARTICLE | |||||||
| DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.18922-0 | ||||||||
| Online 18 March 2003 | ||||||||
|
|
Many plant virus genera encode a 'triple gene block' (TGB), a specialized evolutionarily conserved gene module involved in the cell-to-cell and long-distance movement of viruses. The TGB-based transport system exploits the co-ordinated action of three polypeptides to deliver viral genomes to plasmodesmata and to accomplish virus entry into neighbouring cells. Although data obtained on both the TGB and well-studied single protein transport systems clearly demonstrate that plant viruses employ host cell pathways for intra- and intercellular trafficking of genomic nucleic acids and proteins, there is no integral picture of the details of molecular events during TGB-mediated virus movement. Undoubtedly, understanding the molecular basis of the concerted action of TGB-encoded proteins in transporting viral genomes from cell to cell should provide new insights into the general principles of movement protein function. This review describes the structure, phylogeny and expression of TGB proteins, their roles in virus cell-to-cell movement and potential influence on host antiviral defences.
| INTRODUCTION |
Plant viruses require virus-encoded proteins to move from cell to
cell via plasmodesmata (PD). The non-virion 30 kDa protein of
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) was the first specific viral
protein identified that could support intercellular plant virus
spread (Leonard & Zaitlin, 1982
; Ohno et al., 1983
; Deom et
al., 1987
) and, therefore, was defined as a
'transport protein', or, currently, 'movement
protein' (MP) (Hull, 1989
; Atabekov & Taliansky, 1990
). Functions that
have been definitively or tentatively assigned to the 30 kDa-like
MPs (Melcher, 2000
) include targeting of viral RNA to PD and
increase in the effective PD pore size (SEL, size exclusion limit)
to allow trafficking of the RNA or an RNAMP complex
(ribonucleoprotein complex, RNP) through the pore (Carrington et
al., 1996
; Lazarowitz & Beachy, 1999
; Leisner, 1999
; Lucas, 1999
;
Tzfira et al., 2000
; Blackman & Overall, 2001
; Haywood et
al., 2002
; Heinlein, 2002a
).
A number of positive-stranded RNA viruses have been found to lack
gene products with similarity to the TMV MP (Mushegian &
Koonin, 1993
). Comparisons of genomic sequences in some
such viruses revealed a strikingly similar element of three
partially overlapping ORFs called the 'triple gene
block' (TGB) (Bouzoubaa et al., 1986
; Morozov et
al., 1987
, 1989
; Forster et al., 1988
; Huisman et
al., 1988
; Skryabin et al., 1988
; Rupasov et
al., 1989
). TGB-encoded proteins are referred to as
TGBp1, TGBp2 and TGBp3, according to the positions of their genes
(Solovyev et al., 1996
). Further accumulation of plant virus
genome sequence data revealed TGBs in the genera Potexvirus,
Carlavirus, Allexivirus, Foveavirus,
Hordeivirus, Benyvirus, Pomovirus and
Pecluvirus (Fig.
1). While arrangement of the TGB cistrons
relative to each other is well conserved, TGB positions in the
genomes of viruses of different genera can vary considerably (Fig. 1) (Morozov et al., 1989
; Morozov &
Solovyev, 1999
). Mutational analyses of infectious cDNA
clones of virus genomes demonstrate that all three TGB proteins are
essential for the virus movement process (Petty & Jackson,
1990
; Petty
et al., 1990
; Beck et al., 1991
; Gilmer et
al., 1992
; Herzog et al., 1998
). Thus, movement
functions carried on the single TMV MP are likely to be distributed
over three proteins in TGB-containing viruses, a feature that makes
such viruses an attractive model to investigate the movement
process.
Fig. 1. TGB in
viruses of different genera. Genes are shown as boxes and molecular
masses of encoded proteins are indicated. TGB is shown in green.
Genes of replicative proteins are shown in yellow and the locations
of conserved protein sequence domains of methyltransferase (MT),
protease (PRO), helicase (HEL) and polymerase (POL) are indicated.
CP, coat protein gene; cys, genes of cysteine-rich proteins. Arrows
depict weak terminator codons that can undergo readthrough.
Readthrough domains of CPs are shown in dark blue. The third TGB
gene of Shallot virus X (ShVX) lacks the initiator AUG codon
and is indicated by an open box. PVX, Potato virus X
(X05198); ASPV, Apple stem pitting virus (D21829); PVM,
Potato virus M (X53062); ShVX, Shallot virus X
(M97264); BNYVV, Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (X05147,
X04197, M36894 and M36897); BSMV, Barley stripe mosaic virus
(U35768, U35772 and U13918); PMTV, Potato mop-top virus
(AJ238607, NC_003724 and AJ277556); PCV, Peanut clump virus
(X78602 and L07269).
| PHYLOGENY AND SEQUENCE COMPARISONS OF TGB PROTEINS |
The TGB is found in only some viruses of the
'alpha-like' or 'Sindbis-like' supergroup
(Fig. 1) (Koonin & Dolja,
1993
;
Mushegian & Koonin, 1993
; Morozov & Solovyev, 1999
), a feature that
might reflect emergence of the TGB in virus(es) of this
phylogenetic branch followed by co-adaptation between replication
and movement genes.
TGBp1 contains a NTPase/helicase sequence domain that is closely
related to the replicative helicases of alpha-like viruses and
belongs to helicases of superfamily I (SF-I) (Fig. 2) (Gorbalenya et
al., 1989
; Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Koonin &
Dolja, 1993
). Of seven typical motifs in this domain,
motif I, with a characteristic GKS/T tripeptide, and motif II are
responsible for binding ATP and Mg2+ and correspond to
the 'Walker A' and 'Walker B' sites found
in numerous ATP-binding proteins (Figs 2 and 3)
(Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
). Phylogenetic
analysis of the NTPase/helicase sequences allows clustering of
TGBp1 into two major groups, corresponding to filamentous viruses
(genera Potexvirus, Carlavirus, Foveavirus and
Allexivirus) and rod-shaped viruses (genera
Hordeivirus, Benyvirus, Pomovirus and
Pecluvirus). Furthermore, the molecular masses of TGBp1 in
filamentous viruses range from 24 to 26 kDa and the NTPase/helicase
domain comprises the entire sequence, whereas TGBp1s of rod-shaped
viruses are substantially larger from 39 to 63 kDa
and contain additional long N-terminal domains (Figs 1
and 2) (Solovyev et al., 1996
; Wong et al., 1998
; Erhardt et
al., 1999b
). Peculiar features of these extensions
are (i) the presence of arginine/lysine-rich clusters, possibly
involved in binding of nucleic acids, and (ii) a region of sequence
similarity just upstream of the helicase domain (Figs 2 and 3)
(Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Solovyev et al., 1996
).
Fig. 2. Molecular organization of TGBp1. The dark grey region indicates the
position of the helicase sequence domain with the seven conserved
motifs IVI. Black boxes labelled '+' indicate
positively charged stretches in the N-terminal protein regions.
PSLV, Poa semilatent virus; PCV, Peanut clump virus;
BNYVV, Beet necrotic yellow vein virus.
Fig. 3. Amino
acid alignments of the sequences located upstream of conserved
motif I of the TGBp1 helicase domain in hordei-like TGB (a) and
potex-like TGB (b). Asterisks show the position of the conserved
GKS tripeptide. The conserved arginine residue involved in RNA
binding (see text) is indicated by '#'. Numbers in
parentheses indicate distances from the N terminus. BSMV, Barley
stripe mosaic virus; PSLV, Poa semilatent virus; LRSV,
Lychnis ringspot virus; PMTV, Potato mop-top virus;
BSBV, Beet soil-borne virus; BBNV, Broad bean necrosis
virus; BVQ, Beet virus Q; PCV, Peanut clump
virus; BNYVV, Beet necrotic yellow vein virus; NVMV,
Nicotiana velutina mosaic virus; PVX, Potato virus X; PlAMV,
Plantago asiatica mosaic virus; WClMV, White clover mosaic
virus; CYMV, Clover yellow mosaic virus; PMV, Papaya
mosaic virus; NMV, Narcissus mosaic virus; PAMV,
Potato aucuba mosaic virus; BMV, Bamboo mosaic virus;
FMV, Foxtail mosaic virus; PVM, Potato virus M; PVS,
Potato virus S; CVB, Chrysanthemum virus B; LSV,
Lily symptomless virus; ShVX, Shallot virus X; GVA,
Garlic virus A; GVB, Garlic virus B; ASPV, Apple
stem pitting virus; CNRMV, Cherry necrotic rusty mottle
virus.
TGBp2 and TGBp3 contain hydrophobic sequences predicted to be
involved in interaction of protein with membranes (Morozov et
al., 1987
, 1989
). All TGBp2s contain two hydrophobic
segments, with a conserved central region between them (Fig. 4a), which exhibit the
highest degree of sequence conservation among the TGB proteins
(Morozov et al., 1987
; Skryabin et al., 1988
; Solovyev et
al., 1996
).
Fig. 4. Molecular organization of TGBp2 and TGBp3. (a) Conserved regions of
the proteins. Molecular masses of proteins in different genera are
shown. Dark grey boxes indicate hydrophobic transmembrane sequence
segments. Characteristic signature sequences are shown.
'???' indicates lack of information on sequence
conservation in TGBp3 of benyviruses. (b) Predicted topology of
TGBp2 and TGBp3 molecules in the cell membrane. Transmembrane
helixes are depicted as cylinders; '+' and
'' show the net charge of hydrophilic
regions of the proteins. The short N-terminal hydrophilic segment
of hordei-like TGBp2 in rod-shaped viruses has a positive net
charge of 2 to 3, the corresponding region of potex-like TGBp2 in
filamentous viruses is neutral or has a positive net charge of 1.
Conversely, the C-terminal hydrophilic segment in filamentous
viruses possesses a net charge of 2 to 5.
Unlike TGBp2, which shows almost uniform molecular organization in
viruses of different genera, sequences of TGBp3 form two main
groups. In filamentous viruses of the genera Potexvirus,
Carlavirus, Foveavirus and Allexivirus, the
613 kDa TGBp3 contains one hydrophobic sequence at the N
terminus followed by a conserved region with the characteristic
signature CX5GX8C (Fig.
4a) (Morozov et al., 1991a
). Another type of
TGBp3 characteristic of rod-shaped viruses of the genera
Hordeivirus, Pomovirus and Pecluvirus consists
of 1824 kDa proteins with two transmembrane segments, a
conserved sequence in the N-terminal region containing invariant
cysteine and histidine residues and the central conserved region
with a typical tetrapeptide QDLN (Fig.
4a) (Solovyev et al., 1996
; Koenig et
al., 1998
). Note that the conserved sequences in the
TGBp3 hydrophilic regions of these two groups are not similar to
one another. A third type of TGBp3 molecular organization is found
in the genus Benyvirus, with two transmembrane segments but
no significant sequence similarity with TGBp3 of the other
rod-shaped viruses (Fig. 4a).
Hence, a polyphyletic origin of TGBp3 can be proposed, whereas
TGBp2, similarly to TGBp1 (Koonin & Dolja, 1993
), most probably
originates from a common ancestor (Solovyev et al.,
1996
).
Based upon rules for topology of integral membrane proteins (Sipos
& Von Heijne, 1993
; Gafvelin et al., 1997
), hordeivirus TGBp2
and TGBp3 molecules are proposed to be integrated into the lipid
bilayer in a U-like conformation with their N terminus exposed to
the cytoplasm and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen/extracellular
space, respectively (Solovyev et al., 1996
). Another protein
topology can be predicted for the potexvirus TGBp3s (Fig. 4b).
Thus, primary structure comparisons of the three TGB proteins allow
us to distinguish two classes of TGBs: 'hordei-like'
(class 1) and 'potex-like' (class 2) (Figs 1, 2 and 4)
(Solovyev et al., 1996
; Erhardt et al., 1999b
). The biological
relevance of this classification is confirmed by the different role
played by viral coat protein (CP) in cell-to-cell movement of the
viruses with different types of TGB (Callaway et al.,
2001
). The CP
is dispensable for cell-to-cell movement mediated by hordei-like
TGBs (Petty & Jackson, 1990
; Schmitt et al., 1992
; Herzog et
al., 1998
; McGeachy & Barker, 2000
). In contrast, the
CP of potexviruses and, presumably, of other viruses with
potex-like TGBs, is necessary for intercellular transport of the
viral genome (Chapman et al., 1992
; Forster et
al., 1992
; Sit & Abouhaidar, 1993
) (see below).
| EXPRESSION OF TGB PROTEINS IN VIRUS-INFECTED PLANTS |
TGB proteins are expressed simultaneously at the early stages of
infection (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990
; Donald at
al., 1993
), as are MPs of other viruses, such as TMV (Lehto
et al., 1990
). Similarly to other Sindbis-like viruses,
expression of 5´-distal genes in TGB-containing viruses occurs
via subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) that are 3´ co-terminal with
genomic RNAs (Buck, 1996
; Agranovsky & Morozov, 1999
). For TGBp1 and
TGBp2, sgRNAs of the appropriate sizes have been found in infected
plants, whereas TGBp3-specific sgRNA is not commonly detected
(Guilford & Forster, 1986
; Dolja et al., 1987
; Gilmer et
al., 1992
; Zhou & Jackson, 1996
). Detailed studies
of TGB expression demonstrated that two sgRNAs are sufficient for
translation of the three TGB proteins: the longer sgRNA serves as
the template for translation of TGBp1, while the shorter sgRNA is
the messenger for both TGBp2 and TGBp3 (Morozov et al.,
1991b
; Zhou
& Jackson, 1996
; Verchot et al., 1998
; Agranovsky &
Morozov, 1999
). Expression of TGBp3 by leaky ribosome
scanning through the TGBp2 gene was proposed (Skryabin et
al., 1988
; Morozov et al., 1989
). This translation
strategy maintains a low level of TGBp3 expression. For example,
in vitro translation of a sgRNA transcript yields TGBp2 and
TGBp3 in the ratio 10:1 (Zhou & Jackson, 1996
). Furthermore, the
expression level of TGBp3 in infected plants may be even lower, as
suggested by the inability to detect TGBp3, while TGBp2 is detected
easily (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990
; Donald et
al., 1993
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
| FUNCTIONS OF TGBp1 |
Biochemical activities of TGBp1 in vitro
Cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses was postulated to involve
specific non-virion transport RNPs (Atabekov & Dorokhov,
1984
;
Citovsky & Zambryski, 1993
), and further experiments have
demonstrated that all tested MPs of the '30K
superfamily' are nucleic acid-binding proteins (Carrington
et al., 1996
; Ghoshroy et al., 1997
; Tzfira et
al., 2000
). The TGBp1 proteins, similarly to 30K
superfamily MPs, can bind ssRNA non-specifically in a co-operative
manner and have affinity for ssDNA as well (Rouleau et al.,
1994
;
Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 2001
; Donald et
al., 1997
). For the potex-like TGBp1s, stability of
in vitro co-operative binding to RNA is lower than for the
30K superfamily MPs (Rouleau et al., 1994
; Kalinina et
al., 1996
, 1998
; Lough et al., 1998
; Wung et
al., 1999
). The RNA-binding site of potexviral TGBp1
has been mapped to the N-terminal protein region containing
positively charged residues essential for interaction with RNA. One
of these residues is an arginine, conserved in all potex-like
TGBp1, 1719 aa upstream of the GKS/T tripeptide (Fig. 3) (Morozov et al., 1999
; Wung et
al., 1999
).
Multiple RNA-binding sites are found in hordeiviral TGBp1 (Donald
et al., 1995
, 1997
). The isolated C-terminal helicase domain
of a hordeiviral TGBp1 shows co-operative RNA binding similar to
that of potex-like TGBp1, while the N-terminal extension domain
demonstrates strong non-co-operative RNA binding, so that the whole
protein exhibits both types of binding (Kalinina et al.,
2001
).
Similarly, other hordei-like TGBp1s are capable of strong,
salt-resistant RNA binding (Bleykasten et al., 1996
; Donald et
al., 1997
; Cowan et al., 2002
). In hordeiviral
TGBp1s, the two short arginine/lysine-rich regions are essential
for N-terminal extension domain-specific RNA binding (Solovyev
et al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 2001
). Likewise, RNA
binding of a benyvirus TGBp1 is specified by an
arginine/lysine-rich region positioned 618 residues from
the N terminus (Fig. 2) (Bleykasten
et al., 1996
).
Both potex- and hordei-like TGBp1s have RNA helicase activity in
vitro (Kalinina et al., 2002
). Importantly, the
hordeiviral TGBp1 helicase unwinds the duplex in both the
5´
3´ and the 3´
5´ directions, with
respect to the chain used for entry, and is unable to unwind DNA
duplexes (Kalinina et al., 2002
). In contrast,
superfamily I (SF-I) DNA helicases and RNA virus SF-II helicases
operate in the 3´
5´ direction only (Gorbalenya &
Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
). Generally, the
duplex unwinding activity of helicases depends on the hydrolysis of
NTPs, preferentially ATP (Gorbalenya et al., 1989
; Gorbalenya &
Koonin, 1993
; Kadare & Haenni, 1997
; Soultanas &
Wigley, 2001
; Caruthers & McKay, 2002
). Accordingly, the
RNA helicase activity of TGBp1 requires ATP and Mg2+
(Kalinina et al., 2002
), and NTP-binding and
Mg2+-dependent NTPase activities have been detected for
TGBp1 in vitro (Rouleau et al., 1994
; Bleykasten et
al., 1996
; Kalinina et al., 1996
; Donald et
al., 1997
; Morozov et al., 1999
; Solovyev et
al., 1999
; Liou et al., 2000
). Finally, many
helicases can form homodimers or oligomers (Gorbalenya &
Koonin, 1993
) and both hordei- and potex-like TGBp1 are
capable of self-interactions (Cowan et al., 2002
; our unpublished
data).
Four structural domains have been identified in SF-I DNA helicases.
The N-terminal domain 1A includes helicase motifs IIII,
while the C-terminal domain 2A carries motifs IVVI. The
sequences of domains 1A and 2A are interrupted by the inserted
domains 1B and 2B (Fig.
5) (Soultanas & Wigley, 2001
; Caruthers &
McKay, 2002
). Alignment with the sequence of PcrA, a
bacterial SF-I DNA helicase with known three-dimensional structure,
demonstrates that TGBp1 shows (i) conservation of the helicase
motifs in domains 1A and 2A and (ii) the absence of domains 1B and
2B, which are precisely 'deleted' from the TGBp1
sequences (Fig. 5) (Kalinina et
al., 2002
). Importantly, deletion of the 2B domain
introduced in a bacterial SF-I DNA helicase (Rep protein) had no
effect on helicase activity in vitro and in vivo
(Cheng et al., 2002
). Hence, TGBp1 represents a naturally
'simplified' version of a SF-I helicase with just two
structural domains. Interestingly, a similar structure has been
described for the cellular eIF-4A helicase, the prototype member of
the 'DEAD' SF-II family of RNA helicases, which shares
with TGBp1 two other features exceptional among RNA helicases,
namely the ability to discriminate between RNA and DNA and to
operate in both directions (Gorbalenya & Koonin, 1993
; Kadare &
Haenni, 1997
; Caruthers & McKay, 2002
; Du et al.,
2002
;
Kalinina et al., 2002
).
Fig. 5. Subdomain structure of TGBp1 helicases. (a) Comparison of TGBp1
helicase and PcrA, a bacterial DNA helicase. Conserved sequence
motifs IVI are indicated. Domains 1A and 2A are shown in
red and yellow, respectively. Domains 1B and 2B, absent from TGBp1,
are shown in grey. (b) Putative secondary structure of the helicase
domain of TGBp1. In the modified model of the secondary structure
of PcrA (Caruthers & McKay, 2002
), sequence elements represented by
parallel
structures and conserved in domains 1A and 2A
of TGBp1 are shown in colour. Arrows point to the positions of
conserved sequence motifs IVI. Domains 1B and 2B, absent
from TGBp1, are shown by grey circles.
Activities of TGBp1 in vivo
RNA-binding activity of TGBp1 is thought to be responsible for
formation of movement-competent genomic RNPs; such structures
composed of viral RNA and TGBp1 were isolated from
hordeivirus-infected plants (Brakke et al., 1988
). Although the
nature of movement-related RNPs in potexviruses remains obscure,
they also contain TGBp1, which has been suggested to either
interact with non-virion complexes that also contain CP (Lough
et al., 1998
, 2000
) or to bind to and modify virions in a
manner that allows them to transport to and through PD (Fig. 6) (Santa Cruz et
al., 1998
; Atabekov et al., 2000
).
Fig. 6. General
scheme of TGB-mediated cell-to-cell movement and formation of
transport RNP complexes. Processes specific for potex-like and
hordei-like TGBs are shown in pink and green, respectively.
Transport steps common for both potex- and hordei-like
TGBs are shown in blue. Processes that are not involved directly in
virus cell-to-cell movement are shown in grey. Cell-to-cell
movement initiates with the synthesis of virus genomic and
subgenomic RNAs in the replication complexes located on membranes
of the ER or other organelles (Plante et al., 2000
; Dunoyer et
al., 2002b
; Schwartz et al., 2002
). TGBp1 is
synthesized on free polysomes. Most probably, the hydrophobic TGBp2
and TGBp3 MPs enter the ER co-translationally, and the hydrophobic
regions of TGBp2 and TGBp3 migrate into the ER membrane (Vitale
& Denecke, 1999
). TGBp2 and TGBp3 travel to their
destinations in specific membrane containers (Jiang & Rogers,
1998
;
Mitsuhashi et al., 2001
; Stephens & Pepperkok, 2001
; Nebenführ,
2002
;
Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). Trafficking to the cell periphery may
exploit the cytoskeleton-based pathway (Ploubidou & Way,
2001
; von
Bargen et al., 2001
; Heinlein, 2002a
). TGBp2/p3-specific
membrane containers may bind movement-competent virions (or RNPs)
containing TGBp1, either through proteinprotein
interactions or via direct interaction of TGBp2 and RNA (Solovyev
et al., 2000
; Cowan et al., 2002
; Zamyatnin et
al., 2002
). These complexes are delivered to the
neck region of PD and fuse to cortical ER (Solovyev et al.,
2000
;
Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; Lee et al., 2003
). TGBp1 reaches the
orifice of a PD microchannel and binds to receptor(s) involved in
SEL increase (Lough et al., 1998
; Lucas, 1999
; Lee et al.,
2003
; Roberts
& Oparka, 2003
). TGBp1 and viral RNA are unfolded and
then translocated through the PD microchannels until reaching the
neighbouring cell (Kragler et al., 1998
; Lucas, 1999
). For further
details, see text.
The role of the other TGBp1 activities (NTP binding, NTPase and RNA
helicase) in cell-to-cell movement remains unclear. According to
recent views, the cell-to-cell movement of viral genomes is an
energy-dependent process (Carrington et al., 1996
; Ghoshroy et
al., 1997
). There are at least two steps of
MP-mediated translocation of nucleic acids where such
ATP/NTP-dependent events may be involved: (i) intracellular
transport of MP and virus-specific RNP to PD or to a region in the
vicinity of PD and (ii) trafficking of proteins and RNP through PD
involving both protein/RNA unfolding and microchannel dilation
(Fig. 6) (Ghoshroy et al.,
1997
;
Lazarowitz & Beachy, 1999
; Lucas, 1999
; Kragler et
al., 1998
; Tzfira et al., 2000
; Haywood et
al., 2002
; Heinlein, 2002b
; Roberts &
Oparka, 2003
).
No ability to modify PD and move cell to cell has been reported for
individually expressed hordei-like TGBp1, suggesting that this
protein is incapable of intracellular trafficking to PD by itself
and depends on TGBp2 and TGBp3 for this function (discussed below).
Conversely, potexviral TGBp1 is capable of interacting with PD and
increasing PD SEL (Angell et al., 1996
; Lough et
al., 1998
, 2000
; Malcuit et al., 1999
; Morozov et
al., 1999
; Yang et al., 2000
). Mutations
influencing the potexviral TGBp1 helicase motif I (disabling both
helicase and NTPase activities of the protein) block the
protein's ability to increase PD SEL, whereas mutations of
motif VI (disabling the helicase but not NTPase activity) (Kalinina
et al., 2002
) affect neither the increase in
TGBp1-induced SEL nor TGBp1 transport to the cell periphery (Lough
et al., 1998
; Morozov et al., 1999
). Thus, ATP binding
and/or hydrolysis rather than helicase activity per se are involved
in PD dilation by potex-like TGBp1.
Potexviral TGBp1 is co-translocated with the CP and virus genomic
RNA during virus movement through PD (Morozov et al.,
1997
; Lough
et al., 1998
, 2000
, 2001
). It is natural to propose that TGBp1
helicases couple RNA unwinding and translocation through PD
microchannels. The discovery of a specialized RNA-translocating
NTPase (P4 protein) that participates in RNA transfer and packaging
into bacteriophage
6 virions (Juuti et al., 1998
) further supports
such a proposal.
TGBp1 of Potato virus X (PVX) has been reported to interact
with one end of the virion and to induce energy-dependent
conformational changes of virus particles in vitro (Atabekov
et al., 2000
). Soultanas & Wigley (2001
) have suggested
that energy generated by ATP hydrolysis can be used by helicases
not only for separation of base-paired regions but also for
displacement of other proteins from nucleic acids. Thus, by analogy
with some SF-II cell and viral helicases ('RNPases')
involved in disassembly and remodelling of RNP complexes (Tseng
et al., 1998
; Jankowsky et al., 2001
; Schwer, 2001
), TGBp1 could
potentiate cell-to-cell transport of virions or movement-related
RNPs through PD by disrupting both RNAprotein
interactions and intramolecular RNA base-pairing. In this case, in
addition to trafficking of viral genomes through PD, hordei-like
TGBp1 may mediate a displacement of cell proteins prior to genomic
RNA transport to PD. During viral genome replication, nascent RNA
molecules are most likely packaged into RNPs by host cytosolic
proteins which rapidly coat newly synthesized cellular and
virus-specific mRNAs and facilitate their efficient translation and
further turnover (Mitchell & Tollervey, 2001
; Pilipenko et
al., 2001
; Fedoroff, 2002
). Re-packaging of
such RNPs by replacement of cell proteins with hordei-like TGBp1
may result in formation of movement-competent non-translatable RNPs
(Karpova et al., 1999
).
TGBp1 as a factor of whole plant infection
CPs are dispensable for systemic infection of hordeiviruses and
pomoviruses, which are thus believed to enter the phloem and
traffick along the sieve tubes as a non-virion RNP containing
genomic RNA and TGBp1 (Brakke et al., 1988
; Petty &
Jackson, 1990
; Donald et al., 1997
; McGeachy &
Barker, 2000
; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001b
). In hordeiviral
TGBp1, two positively charged motifs responsible for RNA-binding
activity of the N-terminal extension domain (Fig. 2) have been found to be dispensable
for virus transport from cell to cell but, nevertheless, necessary
for long-distance virus movement. Therefore, the RNA-binding
activities of the helicase and extension domains of hordei-like
TGBp1 could be specialized in either cell-to-cell or long-distance
transport, respectively (Kalinina et al., 2001
). However, the
presence of the N-terminal extension in TGBp1 and its compatibility
with the helicase domain are required to support both cell-to-cell
and long-distance movement in hordeiviruses (Donald et al.,
1995
,
1997
;
Solovyev et al., 1999
).
In contrast to hordeiviruses, a functional CP is required for
potexvirus long-distance movement (Santa Cruz et al.,
1998
).
Potexviral TGBp1 is co-transported along the phloem sieve tube
together with virions (or a non-virion CP-containing RNP). Because
the sieve element contains no translational apparatus, this complex
with TGBp1 must include all functional activities required for
exiting from the sieve tube to the companion cells (Santa Cruz
et al., 1998
; Lough et al., 2001
).
The ability of the virus to establish systemic infection in plants
depends largely on the efficacy of plant defence response against
infection versus the potential of the virus to escape or counter
this defence (Carrington et al., 2001
; Dangl & Jones,
2001
; Vance
& Vaucheret, 2001
). One of the defence mechanisms in plants
is gene silencing, which is mediated by sequence-specific
degradation of viral RNAs in the cytoplasm (Baulcombe, 2002
;
Voinnet, 2001
; Waterhouse et al., 2001
). However,
TGB-containing viruses, like many plant viruses, have evolved
special mechanisms to suppress RNA silencing (Voinnet et
al., 2000
; Dunoyer et al., 2002a
; Yelina et
al., 2002
). In particular, potexviral TGBp1 has been
shown to suppress production or activity of the mobile silencing
signal (Voinnet et al., 2000
). Importantly, some of the sequences of
TGBp1 involved in suppressing the silencing activity do not affect
cell-to-cell movement (D. Baulcombe, The Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK, personal communication).
Another virus resistance mechanism is mediated by a large family of
R gene-encoded proteins that recognize pathogen-encoded elicitors
and trigger defence pathways, such as programmed cell death or
hypersensitive response (Dangl & Jones, 2001
; Holt et
al., 2003
). PVX TGBp1 has been shown recently to be
such an elicitor recognized by the Nb gene-mediated resistance
system in potatos. The TGBp1 region required for activation of the
Nb response is located in the N terminus upstream of the
helicase motif I (Malcuit et al., 1999
).
| FUNCTIONS OF TGBp2 AND TGBp3 |
Subcellular distribution of TGBp2 and TGBp3 and virus movement
In agreement with sequence analysis (Fig.
4) and in vitro studies predicting that TGBp2 and
TGBp3 are integral membrane proteins (Morozov et al.,
1987
,
1990
, 1991a
),
cell fractionation of plant tissues expressing these proteins
demonstrates predominant association of both proteins with the P1
and P30 membranous fractions as well as with the cell wall (CW)
fraction (Niesbach-Klösgen et al., 1990
; Donald et
al., 1993
; Hefferon et al., 1997
; Cowan et
al., 2002
; Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Further studies of subcellular localization of TGBp2 and TGBp3
employed their GFP fusions expressed in plant cells by a variety of
techniques. Note that experiments on transient expression of MPs
should be interpreted cautiously, since MPs expressed from vectors
are likely produced in much larger quantities and in a
non-regulated fashion compared to a virus infection. Also, methods
of delivery of expression vectors such as high-pressure biolistic
bombardment may perturb cell status (Crawford & Zambryski,
2001
) and
functional properties of proteins may be hindered by the fused
fluorescent protein sequences (Thomas & Maule, 2000
; Brandizzi et
al., 2002a
). Nevertheless, transient expression of
GFP fusions is widely used to study MPs in live cells and the
results of such studies do not usually contradict data obtained by
other methods (Lazarowitz, 1999
; Lazarowitz & Beachy, 1999
; Brandizzi et
al., 2002a
; Heinlein, 2002a
).
When transiently expressed in individual epidermal cells of
Nicotiana benthamiana, GFP-tagged TGBp2s of Poa
semilatent virus (PSLV) and Potato mop-top virus (PMTV)
are localized to elements of the cell endomembrane system, mainly
tubules of the cortical ER network (Solovyev et al.,
2000
; Cowan
et al., 2002
; Zamyatnin et al., 2003
). In cells with
higher levels of PSLV TGBp2 expression, a part of the protein is
also associated with motile vesicles (Solovyev et al.,
2000
) that
resemble plant Golgi stacks (Brandizzi et al., 2002b
). The Golgi-like
mobile vesicles have been found to contain most of the transiently
expressed TGBp2 of PVX (our unpublished data). Subcellular
localization of TGBp2 to the ER and Golgi is determined by the
hydrophobic protein segments and, in particular, the length of the
C-terminal hydrophobic segment (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Zamyatnin et
al., 2002
; our unpublished data), which seems to act
as a retrieval signal in Golgi-to-ER recycling by the host receptor
Rer1 (Sato et al., 1999
, 2001
).
Transiently expressed individual GFPTGBp3 is found in
membrane bodies of different sizes located at the cell periphery in
close association with the CW (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Cowan et
al., 2002
). TGBp3 expression has little effect on
the basic structure of the ER in plant cells. However, TGBp3
synthesis results in the formation of new TGBp3-containing ER
structures (peripheral bodies) connected with the cortical ER
network (Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et
al., 2003
). The size of these bodies correlates with
the amount of TGBp3 protein produced in a given cell (Zamyatnin
et al., 2002
). Thus, TGBp3 is able to induce formation
(or proliferation) of a specific subdomain of the cortical ER.
A clue to the subcellular location of the TGBp3-containing bodies
comes from fluorescent microscopy of leaves infected with a PMTV
GFPTGBp3-expressing virus vector (Cowan et al.,
2002
) and
transgenic plants expressing PSLV GFPTGBp3 (Gorshkova
et al., 2003
). When the protein is expressed in
adjacent cells, the peripheral bodies formed in the two
neighbouring cells are opposite to each other. The structural link
that governs the formation of such twin bodies could be provided by
PD (Cowan et al., 2002
) and specific staining of PD-associated
callose confirms the localization of TGBp3-containing bodies
alongside of PD (Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Targeting of PSLV TGBp3 depends on a specific signal consisting of
two parts, of which a central hydrophilic region conserved in all
hordei-like TGBp3 (Fig. 4a) seems
to be an oligomerization sequence (Cowan et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et
al., 2003
; our unpublished data). Another part of
the specific PD targeting signal of TGBp3 is located in the
C-terminal transmembrane segment, which resembles a hydrophobic
membrane-embedded segment that participates in forming a protein
trafficking signal of mastrevirus MP (Kotlizky et al.,
2000
).
Similarly, localization of PVX TGBp3 to peripheral bodies depends
on the only protein transmembrane segment (our unpublished data).
Mutations in the hordeivirus TGBp3 signal result in localization of
the protein in a 'granular network' of tiny bodies
visible as a reticulate pattern as if they are formed on the
surface of cortical ER tubules (Solovyev et al., 2000
; our unpublished
data). Thus, it appears that mutations in either part of the
bipartite signal permit protein segregation to ER-exit sites but
cannot mediate further protein trafficking to the final destination
at PD-associated compartments (Fig.
6).
Co-targeting of TGBp2 and TGBp3
In the presence of TGBp3, TGBp2 is re-targeted to peripheral bodies
that resemble the structures observed in cells expressing TGBp3
(Solovyev et al., 2000
). Perfect co-localization of co-expressed
PSLV TGBp2 and TGBp3 in peripheral bodies has been demonstrated,
confirming that the TGBp3 protein directs subcellular targeting of
TGBp2 from the ER network to sites of TGBp3 location (Zamyatnin
et al., 2002
). PVX TGBp3 also targets PVX TGBp2 to
peripheral bodies, showing that TGBp3-directed trafficking of TGBp2
occurs in both hordei- and potex-like TGBs (Solovyev et al.,
2000
).
Proteinprotein interactions that result in the formation
of TGBp2TGBp3 complexes could be the mechanism by which
the two proteins are co-targeted to peripheral bodies. However,
co-expression of TGBp2 and TGBp3 mutants failed to identify regions
potentially responsible for the interaction between TGBp2 and TGBp3
molecules (Solovyev et al., 2000
). Further evidence
for a sequence-independent co-targeting mechanism was obtained in
experiments on co-expression of heterologous TGB proteins. Indeed,
in spite of the absence of sequence similarity of TGBp3 proteins in
hordei- and potex-like TGBs, PVX TGBp3 can target PSLV TGBp2 to
peripheral bodies and PSLV TGBp3 can, likewise, target PVX TGBp2
(Solovyev et al., 2000
). Moreover, PSLV TGBp3 can also target
totally unrelated membrane-bound MPs, such as the C4 protein of
Faba bean necrotic yellows virus (genus Nanovirus)
and the 6K protein of Beet yellows virus (genus
Closterovirus), to peripheral bodies (Zamyatnin et
al., 2002
). This suggests that a sequence-specific
interaction of TGBp2 and TGBp3 molecules is unlikely to be involved
in TGBp3-directed targeting of TGBp2 (Solovyev et al.,
2000
;
Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). Nevertheless, PMTV TGBp3 interacts
physically with the homologous TGBp2 in a yeast two-hybrid system
(Cowan et al., 2002
). Presumably, this interaction may depend
on the residue composition of hydrophobic segments, enabling side
chain interaction between membrane-embedded helices of proteins
(Scholze et al., 2002
; Sjöberg & Garoff, 2003
).
Note that TGBp3 apparently does not traffick any integral membrane
protein, since GFP derivatives statically retained in ER membranes
by synthetic hydrophobic anchors are not targeted by TGBp3
(Zamyatnin et al., 2002
). Thus, it appears that some functional
feature(s), rather then a specific sequence, is responsible for
efficient trafficking of membrane proteins by TGBp3. Such features
could include specific localization and dynamics of the membrane
proteins in the cell endomembrane system, including their ability
to cycle between the ER and the Golgi (our unpublished data).
As noted above, an intermediate step of translocation of TGBp3 to
PD involves its segregation in hypothetical 'TGBp3
islands' in ER membranes (ER-exit sites) (Fig. 6). These protein islands, which
also include TGBp2, can be translocated using the targeting signal
of TGBp3 to a specific receptor near PD in specific membrane
containers (vesicles or tubules) (Stephens & Pepperkok,
2001
;
Nebenführ, 2002
) delivered to the neck region of PD and
fused there to cortical ER tubules (Fig.
6) (Solovyev et al., 2000
; Cowan et
al., 2002
; Zamyatnin et al., 2002
; Gorshkova et
al., 2003
).
Targeting of TGBp1 by TGBp2/TGBp3
Unlike potexviral TGBp1, which is capable of moving intracellularly
to a peripheral layer of cytoplasm and PD (Lough et al.,
1998
; Malcuit
et al., 1999
; Morozov et al., 1999
; Yang et
al., 2000
), hordei-like TGBp1 expressed individually
is not targeted to specific sites at the cell periphery. However,
when TGBp1 is expressed in the presence of other virus products, it
localizes to the punctate structures at the CW (Erhardt et
al., 1999b
, 2000; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001a
). At higher
magnification, these structures are visible as pairs of
disconnected bodies on opposite sides of the CW, closely resembling
the structures formed by GFPTGBp3 in close vicinity to PD
(see above). Accordingly, GFPTGBp1 punctate bodies
co-localized with callose (Erhardt et al., 2000
), confirming the
immuno-gold detection of TGBp1 in PD of infected leaves (Erhardt
et al., 1999b
). Experiments with chimeric virus genomes
suggested TGBp2 and TGBp3 as the most probable components responsible for this
localization. Indeed, a combination of TGBp1 with homologous
TGBp2/TGBp3 was required for TGBp1 function, particularly
trafficking to PD (Lauber et al., 1998
; Lough et
al., 1998
, 2000
; Erhardt et al., 1999a
, 2000; Solovyev
et al., 1999
; Lawrence & Jackson, 2001a
; Zamyatnin et
al., 2003
). Hence, the role of TGBp2/TGBp3 may be
primarily a matter of intracellular delivery of TGBp1-formed
transport-competent RNPs to PD (Fig.
6).
There are indications that TGBp1 is actively, rather than
passively, transported by TGBp2/TGBp3 to PD and that this process
requires enzymatic activities of the protein. Mutations in the
conserved sequence motifs in the NTPase/helicase domains of
hordei-like TGBp1 not only blocked cell-to-cell movement of the
virus but also abolished protein targeting to PD in the presence of
TGBp2 and TGBp3 (Erhardt et al., 2000
; Lawrence &
Jackson, 2001a
; Zamyatnin et al., 2003
).
TGBp2-induced increase in PD permeability and other putative movement-related activities of TGBp2/p3 proteins
Some of the point and insertion mutants of TGBp2 are
dominantnegative, i.e. they inhibit cell-to-cell movement
and diminish virus accumulation (Beck et al., 1994
; Seppanen et
al., 1997
; Lauber et al., 2001
). The recently
discovered ability of potex- and hordei-like TGBp2 to facilitate
movement of GFP between adjacent epidermal cells (Tamai &
Meshi, 2001
; our unpublished data) suggests that
co-expression of a non-functional TGBp2 mutant during infection can
interfere not only with viral RNP trafficking to PD but also with
some additional movement-related function(s).
The molecular nature of the TGBp2-directed increase in PD
permeability is enigmatic. However, a relationship between this
phenomenon and modifications of the tissue stress-response system
can be proposed. In particle bombardment studies, the ability of
GFP, which is a 27 kDa protein, to spread from an initially
transfected epidermal cell of source N. benthamiana leaves
to neighbouring cells depends on experimental conditions. When the
leaves of intact plants are bombarded, GFP spreads over multiple
cell boundaries to give a focus of more than 30 fluorescent cells.
However, GFP is confined mostly to single cells after bombardment
of detached leaves in a vacuum chamber (Oparka et al.,
1999
;
Crawford & Zambryski, 2000
, 2001
; Itaya et al., 2000
; Krishnamurthy
et al., 2002
). Under the latter conditions, TGBp2
potentiates the spread of GFP to adjacent epidermal cells (Tamai
& Meshi, 2001
). Various stress factors, including leaf
detachment, are known to reduce PD SEL due to rapid callose
deposition (Sivaguru et al., 2000
; Crawford &
Zambryski, 2001
; Radford & White, 2001
; Roberts &
Oparka, 2003
). Hence, it is possible that TGBp2
expression is not involved directly in increasing PD permeability
but rather significantly decreases callose deposition in the CW and
can thus inhibit or reverse the stress-induced decrease in PD SEL
(Fig. 6). In line with this
hypothesis, potexvirus TGBp2 has been shown recently to interact
with TIP, a host protein regulator of
-1,3-glucanase, which is a
key enzyme of callose turnover (Fridborg et al., 2003
). Thus, keeping the
PD neck region open by callose degradation (or prevention of
callose accumulation) is a possible function of TGBp2 at the early
stage of infection (Fridborg et al., 2003
). In this context,
it is interesting that co-expression of TGBp3 and TGBp2 completely
blocks the TGBp2-induced 'increase' of PD SEL (our
unpublished data). Probably, trapping of TGBp2 in the peripheral
membrane bodies formed by TGBp3 in the vicinity of PD (see above)
can either prevent interaction between TGBp2 and TIP or directly
block intracellular trafficking of TIP.
Apart from trafficking of TGBp1 and genomic RNA and PD SEL control,
small TGB proteins could be involved directly in regulating a
hypersensitive response (Bleykasten-Grosshans et al.,
1997
;
Solovyev et al., 1999
; Lauber et al., 2001
; Kobayashi et
al., 2001
). We believe that this activity of
TGBp2/p3 could also be related to the regulation of callose
turnover in view of the fact that (i) limitation of PVX spread in a
hypersensitive response is accompanied by heavy callose deposits in
the vicinity of PD (Allison & Shalla, 1974
) and (ii) callose
deposition may regulate virus movement in hypersensitive hosts by
affecting the PD SEL (Iglesias & Meins, 2000
; Bucher et
al., 2001
; Crawford & Zambryski, 2001
; Radford &
White, 2001
).
| CONCLUSION |
There is increasing evidence that viruses exploit endogenous intra-
and intercellular trafficking pathways for spread of proteins and
nucleic acids within plants. A growing number of plant cell
proteins ['non-cell-autonomously acting plant proteins'
(NCAPs)] has been demonstrated to have properties of plant virus
MPs, such as the ability to increase PD SEL and traffic between
cells. Moreover, some of these proteins are able to transport RNA
through PD (Lucas, 1999
; Crawford & Zambryski, 2000
; Tzfira
et al., 2000
; Blackman & Overall, 2001
; Lucas et
al., 2001
; Haywood et al., 2002
; Heinlein,
2002b
; Lee
et al., 2003
; Roberts & Oparka, 2003
).
Importantly, TMV MP, similar to NCAP CmPP16, is not capable of PD
modification and trafficking between cells in the absence of an
assisting cell protein, NCAPP1 (Lee et al., 2003
). The dependence of
TMV MP on NCAPP1 emphasizes the idea that viral MPs act in concert
with a number of as yet undiscovered cell proteins required to
accomplish intra- and intercellular steps in cell-to-cell movement.
Thus, analysis of dissimilar virus transport systems that comprise
several MPs may suggest possible roles of viral proteins that mimic
components of host intracellular trafficking machinery.
TGBp1s share some features with NCAPs involved in plant
development. First, ectopic expression of potexviral TGBp1 appears
to cause defects in the cell-to-cell communications that control
lateral organ development (Foster et al., 2002
). Second, TGBp1
competes directly for intercellular trafficking pathways with NCAP
Knotted-1 (Lough et al., 2000
). Third, the ability of NCAP CmPP16 to
increase PD SEL and traffic through PD depends on an intracellular
trafficking step directed by a membrane protein, NCAPP1, which
localizes to cortical ER compartments in the vicinity of PD (Lee
et al., 2003
), a pathway that parallels TGBp1 transport
to PD-associated ER structures directed by TGBp2/TGBp3 (Fig. 6) (Zamyatnin et al.,
2002
,
2003
;
Gorshkova et al., 2003
).
Carmo- and necroviruses (family Tombusviridae) have a
transport system of two small MPs, an RNA-binding protein and a
membrane protein (Fig.
7) (Hacker et al., 1992
; Marcos et
al., 1999
; Vilar et al., 2002
). Therefore, in
members of the family Tombusviridae, all energy-utilizing
steps of movement likely depend on host proteins, a situation that
is in contrast to TGB and other multicomponent transport systems.
Particularly, in members of the family Potyviridae,
cell-to-cell movement requires the CI protein (Fig. 7), which is an SF-II helicase able
to interact with PD and form conical deposits guiding potyviral
filamentous virions to and through PD (Rodriguez-Cerezo et
al., 1997
; Carrington et al., 1998
; Roberts et
al., 1998
). However, it is not known whether the
functions of the helicases in potexviruses and potyviruses (SF-I
helicase TGBp1 and SF-II helicase CI) are similar. Viruses of the
family Closteroviridae have no movement-related helicase but
encode another ATPase, Hsp70h (Fig.
7), which is related to a large group of cell chaperones
(Hsp70s) involved in energy-coupled processes of protein folding,
degradation and transport (Agranovsky et al., 1991
, 1997
; Ellis & Hartl,
1999
; Pilon
& Schekman, 1999
). Hsp70h is required for cell-to-cell and
long-distance movement as well as for infectivity of virus
particles and assembly of movement-competent virions (Agranovsky
et al., 1998
; Medina et al., 1999
; Peremyslov et
al., 1999
; Napuli et al., 2000
; Alzhanova et
al., 2001
; Prokhnevsky et al., 2002
; Dolja, 2003
). Similarly to
TGBp1 and TGBp2/TGBp3 proteins (which mimic functions of NCAPs and
NCAPP1, respectively), closteroviral Hsp70h may be the virus
counterpart of a host component of a cell-to-cell movement machine.
Fig. 7. Comparison of multicomponent cell-to-cell transport systems encoded
by plant viruses. Genes are shown as boxes with names of encoded
proteins. Genes of proteins involved in cell-to-cell movement are
shown in colour. PRO, proteinase domain; PVX, Potato virus X
(X05198); CarMV, Carnation mottle virus (X02986); PVY,
Potato virus Y (M95491); BYV, Beet yellows virus
(X73476). Potyviral proteins implicated in virus spread in addition
to CI protein (see text) are the genome-linked proteins (VPg), HCpro
and CP (Callaway et al., 2001
; Rajamaki & Valkonen, 1999
; Revers et
al., 1999
; Rojas et al., 1997
; Saenz et
al., 2002
). BYV proteins involved in cell-to-cell
movement in addition to Hsp70h (see text) include CP and its
distant homologue (dCP), the minor CP 64K, the papain-like leader
proteinase responsible for processing replicative protein
precursors and the 6K small hydrophobic protein resembling
potex-like TGBp3 (Alzhanova et al., 2000
; Peng et
al., 2001
, 2002
, 2003
; Napuli et al., 2003
; Dolja, 2003
).
Recently, Aoki et al. (2002
) identified a new subfamily of cell Hsp70
proteins that exhibit properties of NCAPs, including the ability to
interact with PD. Another type of cell chaperone has been shown to
interact with the MP of Tomato spotted wilt virus (von
Bargen et al., 2001
). Additionally, translocation of NCAP
Knotted-1 through PD requires partial protein unfolding (Kragler
et al., 1998
; Roberts & Oparka, 2003
), suggesting the
role of cell chaperones at this step of host- and virus-specific
cell-to-cell movement (Fig. 6). In
general, it can be speculated that plant viruses have acquired and
adopted distinct components of the cell trafficking machinery. As a
result, these adaptive evolutionarily events have allowed viruses
to recruit the existing host pathways of intra- and intercellular
transport.
We are grateful to Dr D. Baulcombe for providing unpublished data and to Dr N. S. Vassetzky for critical reading of the manuscript. Work of the authors was supported in part by Volkswagen-Stiftung, Federal Republic of Germany.
| REFERENCES |
Baulcombe, D. (2002). Viral suppression of systemic silencing. Trends Microbiol 10, 306308.
Hull, R. (1989). The movement of viruses in plant. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27, 213240.
Kadare, G. & Haenni, A. L. (1997). Virus-encoded RNA helicases. J Virol 71, 25832590.
Lawrence, D. M. & Jackson, A. O. (2001b). Requirements for cell-to-cell movement of barley stripe mosaic virus in monocot and dicot hosts. Mol Plant Pathol 2, 6575.
Melcher, U. (2000). The '30K' superfamily of viral movement proteins. J Gen Virol 81, 257266.
Mitchell, P. & Tollervey, D. (2001). mRNA turnover. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13, 320325.
Pilon, M. & Schekman, R. (1999). Protein translocation: how Hsp70 pulls it off. Cell 97, 679682.
Tamai, A. & Meshi, T. (2001). Cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X: the role of p12 and p8 encoded by the second and third open reading frames of the triple gene block. Mol PlantMicrobe Interact 14, 11581167.
Zamyatnin, A. A., Jr, Solovyev, A. G., Sablina, A. A. & 7 other authors (2002). Dual-colour imaging of membrane protein targeting directed by poa semilatent virus movement protein TGBp3 in plant and mammalian cells. J Gen Virol 83, 651662.
© 2003 SGM
This article is now available in the June 2003 print issue of JGV (vol. 84, 13511366). The complete issue of the journal may be seen in electronic form on JGV Online.